This is why I support Thompson:
In 1994 when I first ran, I advocated the same common sense conservative positions that I hold today. They are based upon what I believe to be sound conservative First Principles -- reflecting the nature of man and the wisdom of the ages. They are based upon the conviction that our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution are not outdated documents that have outlived their usefulness. It is a recognition that our basic rights come from God and not from government. That government should have its power divided, not only at the federal level but between the federal government and the states. Federalism is the belief that not every problem should have a federal solution. Essentially it's about freedom. A government that is big enough to do everything for us is powerful enough to do anything to us.I agree with Brody, if Thompson can get this point of view across, it would be a winning message:
Thompson believes there’s an opening to differentiate himself here by essentially saying “Here are my principles and I’ll be consistent by in making every decision based on them.” It could very well position Thompson above the rest of the candidates as someone who is talking more about broad themes and vision rather than policy wonk talk. Reagan had an ability to do this and communicate it well and connect with voters. Thompson seems like he has that ability too. Someone who can speak the language of voters, come across as sincere and stick to conservative principles.Maybe that's the message when he talks to the voters in each individual state and it's the message you read in his articles and commentaries but it's not the message that's been filtered through the MSM and the blogosphere. He needs to speak more loudly for it to get through the buzz about his womanizing, his religious affiliation, his abortion position, his view on Schiavo, etc.
