McCain beat Ron Paul among anti-war Republicans?

Unbelievable and funny, too!

(via)

So, I guess everyone can drop their change theme now?

You couldn't have more of a status quo vote than McCain and Clinton.

McCain wins

What the heck is wrong with these people? They love McCain for some weird reason. I guess they didn't really care about illegal immigration either.

And it's looking like it wasn't an Obama blowout (hehehehe). Yeah! So, he isn't our political savior after all?

The Blogging Caesar predicts a McCain, Obama win

Though he has it pretty close between McCain and Romney.

Romney's new ad against McCain

Brilliant ad by Romney! Hitting McCain on two of the issues that have been the most irksome -- taxes and amnesty -- and using actual voters in NH to criticize McCain. Who does McCain hit for lying about him then? The voters?

(via)

McCain will be Swift-Boated on Monday?

That's the rumor.

FNS perdicts who will win in Iowa

I hope they're wrong! The consensus seems to be Romney, Huckabee and McCain.

Hypocrite Romney accuses McCain of not supporting Bushes taxes cuts

Ugh! Here is what happens when you don't appear to have core values and change given the circumstances. From 2003:

Governor Mitt Romney refused yesterday to endorse tax cuts at the heart of President Bush's economic program, but he told members of the state's congressional delegation during a private meeting he also would not oppose the cuts because he has to maintain "a solid relationship" with the White House.

Here is what he had to say about his hypocrisy:

Turning back to 2003, Romney told the man: "You see, I wasn't a U.S. senator. I didn't have to vote on this, didn't get a choice to. I was running my state, so I didn't have a comment on their position. And I said, `I'm not weighing in on federal issues.' But Senator McCain was a senator. He had to vote. He had to decide, `Am I in favor of pursuing these tax cuts or not?' and he voted against the tax cuts — twice. That's a very different position."

If he actually believed in supply-side economics, he would have defended Bush's tax cuts in 2003 and his reply to the question makes it obvious that he doesn't get it now.

I wonder if National Review realized this before they endorsed him. Why would a conservative magazine endorse a candidate who doesn't believe in supply-side economics?

McCain's Christmas ad

As long time readers (I know that we have a couple) know, I'm not a McCain supporter at all but I thought his Christmas ad was quite moving and it made me tear up. Allahpundit thinks he might have been pandering to Christians, reminding us that he was one of us but I don't care if he was, I thought it was moving and was a wonderful story to share this time of year.

Lieberman to endorse McCain tomorrow

Wow! He's come all the way over to the dark side. He might as well become a Republican because this just put a stake through his political career as a Democrat.

"If you don't agree with the 'Gang of 14' solution then I am not your candidate"

That was John McCain at a very small campaign stop (someone's house):

"If you don't agree with the "Gang of 14" solution then I am not your candidate and you should vote for someone else."

Senator McCain went on to highlight the fact that under the Gang of 14 solution, the Senate did confirm conservative judges like Alito and Roberts. He went to say "I shudder to think what would happen if we had pulled the trigger on the nuclear option and one day Hillary Clinton was appointing judges." He asked me: "would your blogging friends still want to blow up the Senate" if Hillary Clinton was in charge? If so, I am not their candidate!

At least he's honest and he certainly isn't my candidate.