Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Wow! The Washington Post is Printing the Truth About a Democrat

Shocking! I thought the only place that we would be hearing the truth about Murtha was on the Internet and talk radio:

Mr. Murtha's candidacy is troubling for several reasons, beginning with his position on the war in Iraq. A former Marine, Mr. Murtha deserves credit for sounding an alarm about the deteriorating situation a year ago. But his descriptions of the stakes there have been consistently unrealistic, and his solutions irresponsible. Just last week he denied that the United States was fighting terrorism in Iraq, though al-Qaeda is known to play a major part in the insurgency. He said the United States should abandon even the effort to train the Iraqi army and should "redeploy as soon as practicable," an extreme step that most congressional Democrats oppose. He claimed that "stability in the Middle East, stability in Iraq," would come from such an abrupt withdrawal; in fact, virtually all Iraqi and Middle Eastern leaders have said that it would lead to a greatly escalated conflict that could spread through the region.

Mr. Murtha would also be the wrong choice as majority leader after an election in which a large number of voters expressed unhappiness with Washington business as usual. Mr. Murtha has been a force against stronger ethics and lobbying rules. He was one of just four Democrats whose votes helped kill a strong Democratic package of lobbying reforms this spring.

As a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, he has been an avid participant in the orgy of earmarking, including numerous projects sought by a lobbying firm that employed his brother. During the Abscam congressional bribery investigation in 1980, Mr. Murtha was videotaped discussing a bribe with an undercover FBI agent. ("You know, we do business for a while, maybe I'll be interested, maybe I won't, you know," Mr. Murtha said.) He wasn't indicted, but it's fair to say the episode raised questions about his integrity.
So, you mean to tell me that Pelosi is trying to put someone who isn't ethically pure on her team? What about her pledge to clean up Congress? Wasn't she going to "sweep the House clean?" Shouldn't she start with her leadership team. Well, I for one am shocked and amazed that the Democrats aren't more concerned about ethics since that was their theme for their campaigns. I would be shocked if the Democrats don't keep their promise.

BTW, didn't Clinton promise to have the most ethical government ever? And we all know how that turned out.

(Link via little green footballs)

Tags: ,