Here's some good news:
A federal judge on Friday ordered Google Inc. to give the Bush administration a peek inside its search engine, but rebuffed the government's demand for a list of people's search requests — potentially sensitive information that the company had fought to protect.I know that the government has good intentions, I want those who traffic in child porn to be prosecuted but we can't give up our rights to do it. If we do this, the government will not stop at child porn. I commend Google for fighting this so fiercely, I'm glad they fought to protect our freedom. Now, I don't have to worry that the government will know what I've been searching for. (Not that it's anything nafarious, my searches tend to be things like "prevenient grace," "caveat emptor," "television without pity," etc.)
In his 21-page ruling, U.S. District Judge James Ware told Google to provide the U.S. Justice Department with the addresses of 50,000 randomly selected Web sites indexed by its search engine by April 3.
The government plans to use the data for a study in another case in Pennsylvania, where the Bush administration is trying to revive a law meant to shield children from online pornography. Ware, though, decided Google won't have to disclose what people have been looking for on its widely used search engine, handing a significant victory to the company and privacy rights advocates.
"We will always be subject to government subpoenas, but the fact that the judge sent a clear message about privacy is reassuring," Google lawyer Nicole Wong wrote on the company's Web site Friday night. "What his ruling means is that neither the government nor anyone else has carte blanche when demanding data from Internet companies."
